IOC? Or Intentional oral conflict?

Here is a picture of the passage I had which includes the planning to the right of the text and between the lines: 



Heyoooo! So I initially did a voice recording and it was amazing and had a thorough analysis... but I could not upload it on her no matter how hard I tried so I tried it again on this website that could only do around 5 min. at a time so here are the three links to my IOC practice:





Analysis on my analysis on The Handmaids Tale:

A: Knowledge and Understanding of the text or extract- 9

I know that I understood the text, but I could have referenced it more during my analysis of the different quotes to further show my understanding.

B: Understanding of the use and effects of literary devices- 8

I definitely explained how each quotation was relevant, but my literary devices weren't as clear and the effect could have been elaborated more definitively. 

C: Organization- 5

I think the organization of my IOC was organized because my planning time allowed me to write out what I would be talking about during the 8-10 minutes. 

D: Language- 5

I think my language was understandable and comprehensive for the listener to fully understand what I was talking about. 




This IOC definitely wasn't my best practice.. but it is a practice so.. c'mon...


Sincerely,

K-dog

Comments

  1. UnknownMarch 10, 2018 at 1:33 PM

    Grace Copeland: My blog also sucked so its okay. But I thought that your planning process was really good and easy to follow. I tried to write down main points and nothing else and I would forget what I was wanting to say, so I'm going to try your planning method for my real IOC. Also, we only have to have 2 main points, but you had 3 which I think will probably help you score better because you were able to point out more things and bring in more quotes and context.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousMarch 11, 2018 at 9:07 AM

    Hi! This was really good! I think you did a great job explaining the elements and major stylistic features. I really liked your organization and structure and I think you seem to deeply understand the text! Overall, this was a really great IOC!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lauren GeneskyMarch 11, 2018 at 9:13 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMarch 11, 2018 at 8:37 PM

    I think some of the comments above really express what I want to say as well. I agree with Mrs. G you did a really good job of establishing context and background which I feel the assessors will really appreciate because now they will be able to truly understand what is going on in your text as well as what was going on during that time period :). I think that one mistake people tend to make during their IOC is focusing a lot on the novel as a whole, and personally I would say you did a good job of balancing out both areas. Not too little, not too much. Great job Kate the Great.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mckinley heathMarch 12, 2018 at 1:34 AM

    Hey girl! SO good. You did a wonderful job in your analysis and going in-depth, you are clear and easy to understand. One thing that I would work on though is your structure and being able to connect, however overall you did so good!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lauren GeneskyMarch 18, 2018 at 9:59 AM

    Hey!

    I just realized I posted two different scores...ignore that- this is the actual score.

    A: 6-7
    B: 6
    C: 3
    D: 4

    Nice job with context at the beginning; really calm tone and you settle in to a great way to organize your commentary. Make sure you have a clear statement of purpose for the passage and HOW it is developed- try to use specific techniques or devices (you veer on paraphrasing at times and give a bit more of your opinion than what might be wanted). Also, don't worry about MORE (Grace points this out in her comments)- if you do TWO points well, then that's great!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Of Course nothing MATTRESS when you're SLEEPING on life

This Blog post will be analyzing the translations below of the first line in the  Kafka's Metamorphosis  book .  The original sentence of the first line is, " Als Gregor Samsa eines Morgens aus unruhigen Träumen erwachte, fand er sich in seinem Bett zu einem ungeheuren Ungeziefer verwandelt." #1: Gregory Samsa woke from uneasy dreams one morning to find himself changed into a giant bug. The first detail I notice about this line is that the diction is very simple and straight forward which makes the quote easy to understand, but is not a good first impression for the author. It also does not give enough explanation or detail to form images in the reader's mind. The only detailed adjectives given are "giant" and "uneasy". There is also a lot of time that would have had to pass between the transformation of a human to a large bug which is not explained in this first sentence which therefore means that this process may be explained throughou
Read more

What's Dr. Jekyll's favorite game? Hyde and Seek!!

For my analysis on The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson , I will be analyzing the quotes below and creating my own poems. The first quote is from chapter 1, where the text starts: He is not easy to describe... , ending with ...and yet I really can name nothing out of the way. This quote is describing Mr. Hyde. The second quote is from chapter 3, where the text starts: To this rule ..., ending with This is a matter I thought we had agreed to drop. This quote describes Dr. Jekyll. The two quotes are alike in the use of adjectives to describe Mr. Utterson's feelings towards Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Stevenson also uses alliteration when describing Mr. Hyde, "...something displeasing, something downright detestable" (Stevenson 5). He describes Mr. Hyde here as disgraceful and unpleasant. In the second quote, Dr. Jekyll is described as, "...a large, well-made, smooth faced man of fifty, with something of a stylish cast perhaps, b
Read more

Blog Post #4

Jane Erye  by Charlotte Bronte  is the text I will be analyzing for the following question. 1.  How do the elevated diction and elaborate syntax contrast with the feelings of the narrator in paragraphs 11-12?     Upon reading this question, I realized that I had forgotten what Syntax meant, so I provided the definition, incase you also forgot.      Syntax:  the study of the patterns of formation of sentences and phrases from words.     Firstly, the event occurring in this chapter explains the emotional challenges that Jane faces upon seeing Mr. Brocklehurst. She beings to have a flow of overthinking which she describes with words. Diction is the first concept highly present in these paragraphs because there are a lot of complicated words that I had to look up to understand what she was saying. I think the fact that there were some confusing words, hinders the experience of the reader because I had to read these two small paragraphs many times until I was able to comprehe
Read more